Where someImageName is an image. When /bin/somebinary exits, the image will no longer be running.
I would simply like to run an image, without specifying any binaries to run. Instead, I simply want to run the services (eg, systemd / sysvinit) that are normally run inside the images OS.
This seems like the most common thing anyone would ever want to do with Docker, but trying to run an image without a command returns:
2014/02/05 14:49:19 Error: create: No command specified
How can I start a Docker container and run a full OS, rather than specifying a command?
Docker is a system for management and deployment of application containers, not operating system containers. It seems as if you're conflating running a docker container with booting an operating system.
Your Docker containers should be single-purpose, very narrowly-scoped applications that can be started with a single command. If you're looking for something more complex than that, then Docker is not the solution you're looking for. In that case, check out KVM, ESXi, OpenVZ, LXD etc.
If you're just looking for how you can specify a default CMD and ENTRYPOINT for your containers, you can do that at build-time using a Dockerfile.
Just run from the same image as many times as needed. New containers will be created and they can then be started and stoped each one saving its own configuration. For your convenience would be better to give each of your containers a name with "--name".
F.i:
docker run --name MyContainer1 <ubuntu image>
docker run --name MyContainer2 <ubuntu image>
docker run --name MyContainer3 <ubuntu image>
That's it.
$ docker ps
CONTAINER ID IMAGE CREATED STATUS NAMES
a7e789711e62 67759a80360c 12 hours ago Up 2 minutes MyContainer1
87ae9c5c3f84 67759a80360c 12 hours ago Up About a minute MyContainer2
c1524520d864 67759a80360c 12 hours ago Up About a minute MyContainer3
After that you have your containers created forever and you can start and stop them like VMs.